May 30, 2024

About the Author: Reuben

Reuben is a freelance jazz multi-instrumentalist. Having initially trained in classical piano and cello, he moved to London 10 years ago to study jazz, and now performs regularly around the country in a host of bands, including funk band John Motors.

The comparison between jazz and classical piano is often debated among musicians and enthusiasts. Both genres demand a high level of skill, discipline, and creativity to master, yet they differ significantly in their approaches, techniques, and philosophies.

Determining whether jazz piano is harder than classical piano is not straightforward, as the answer largely depends on various factors including individual aptitudes, training backgrounds, and personal musical preferences.

From the outset it is worth noting that a proficient jazz pianist and a proficient classical pianist can often be the same person, and that the process of becoming a master pianist can often result in a high level of performance in both genres.

Woman playing piano

Technical Proficiency and Structure

Classical piano is renowned for its rigorous technical demands and structured learning path. Classical pianists typically follow a progressive curriculum that involves mastering scales, arpeggios, and etudes, along with a repertoire of pieces spanning various historical periods.

The classical tradition places a strong emphasis on accuracy, tone quality, and adherence to the composer’s intentions. Pianists must develop precise finger techniques and the ability to interpret complex scores, often requiring years of disciplined practice.

In contrast, jazz piano, while also technically demanding, focuses more on improvisation and personal expression. Jazz pianists must be adept at playing a wide range of scales and chords, often in non-traditional progressions. They need a deep understanding of harmony, rhythm, and the ability to play by ear.

The freedom and spontaneity inherent in jazz demand a different kind of technical proficiency, one that allows for rapid, creative decision-making during performances. This improvisational aspect can be daunting for those more accustomed to the structured nature of classical music.

This being said, there is a misapprehension that many people have regarding jazz piano, especially when first starting to learn. It’s easy to assume that the need to learn scales and chords replaces good fundamental technique.

In reality, in order to be a proficient improviser on the piano, you need to not have technical drawbacks in your playing. You can only improvise as well as you can fluently play, and so for this reason the body of overall proficiency required to play jazz well, is larger than that of classical piano.

Man playing piano

Improvisation vs. Interpretation

One of the most significant differences between jazz and classical piano lies in the role of improvisation. Classical pianists primarily interpret written scores, with the goal of bringing the composer’s vision to life.

This requires not only technical skill but also a deep understanding of music theory, history, and emotional expression. The challenge is in achieving a balance between technical precision and expressive depth, ensuring that each performance is both accurate and emotionally compelling.

Jazz pianists, on the other hand, are often required to create music on the spot, where the feeling in that time and place dictates the overall vibe of the performance. Improvisation is a cornerstone of jazz, and this requires a high degree of musical intuition, creativity, and theoretical knowledge.

Jazz musicians must be comfortable with creating complex harmonies, rhythmic variations, and melodic lines in real-time. This spontaneity is both the beauty and the challenge of jazz. It demands a different type of mental agility and a willingness to take risks, as each performance is unique and can vary significantly from one rendition to the next.

The one thing that is shared in both improvisation and interpretation, is that a lifelong player will forever be evolving their ability to do either of these things.

Woman hands writing on music sheet while playing piano

Educational Pathways and Learning Curves

The educational pathways for jazz and classical piano also differ markedly. Classical training is often more formalized, with students progressing through graded levels, examinations, and recitals.

This structured approach provides a clear roadmap for skill development and performance benchmarks. Students receive detailed feedback on their technique, interpretation, and overall musicianship, helping them to refine their abilities over time.

For young classical musicians, performance competitions often feature as well, adding a hostile edge to comparative development. Jazz education, while increasingly formalized in institutions, often retains a more informal, mentor-based approach. Many jazz musicians learn through listening, transcribing solos, and playing in ensembles.

The learning process is more self-directed, with a greater emphasis on personal exploration and collaboration with other musicians. This can be challenging for those who thrive on structure and clear guidelines but offers a unique opportunity for creative growth and individual expression.

Because the potential to drift into a specific area of jazz begins very early, it can be very easy for a jazz pianist to back themselves into a corner in which they are limited by their choice of pathway. In this way, classical piano makes itself easier to learn in a sustainable way.

Beautiful woman playing piano

Personal Preferences and Aptitudes

Ultimately, the question of whether jazz piano is harder than classical piano is highly subjective. Some pianists may find the precision and discipline of classical music more challenging, while others may struggle with the improvisational demands of jazz.

Personal aptitudes and preferences play a significant role in determining which genre is more difficult for an individual musician. For example, a pianist with a strong background in music theory and a passion for structured practice may excel in classical music but find jazz improvisation intimidating.

Conversely, a musician with a natural ear for harmony and a love for spontaneous creativity may thrive in jazz but feel constrained by the rigid structures of classical compositions. The ability to read music fluently is a hurdle that triggers many people into choosing to play jazz.


In conclusion, the difficulty of jazz versus classical piano cannot be universally determined, as it depends on individual strengths, training, and musical inclinations. Both genres offer unique challenges and rewards, requiring a high level of skill, dedication, and artistry.

Rather than viewing one as harder than the other, it is more productive to appreciate the distinct qualities and demands of each, recognizing that mastery in either genre is a significant and admirable achievement.

I personally recommend any aspiring jazz pianist to devote plenty of their time to classical techniques, and every classical pianist to try improvisation of any kind.

Doing this will improve any piano player significantly, as there is a huge expanse of discovery available on the piano!

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!

Join London’s most distinguished piano academy for adults

Exclusive music instruction for adults of all ages and abilities (absolute beginners are very welcome!)